Legal Consequences of an Authentic Deed Made by a Notary that is Partial and Dishonest According to Law no. 2 of 2014 concerning the Position of Notary
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61730/hqrtgy94Keywords:
Notary Public, Authentic deed, Impartiality, Legal consequencesAbstract
A notary is a public official who is authorized by the state to make authentic deeds. This position requires the implementation of duties honestly, carefully, independently, and impartially, because the deeds made become evidence for the parties and have high evidentiary power. In practice, deeds are still found that are drafted in a biased manner or contrary to the principle of honesty, thus giving rise to issues regarding the notary's obligations and the legal consequences arising from such deeds. This study aims to: describe the notary's obligations in making authentic deeds according to the provisions of laws and regulations and codes of ethics, and analyze the legal consequences of authentic deeds made in a biased and/or dishonest manner. The method used is normative legal research with a statutory, conceptual, and case approach. Primary legal materials include the Civil Code and the Notary Law and its amendments, accompanied by doctrine and court decisions as secondary materials. The analysis is carried out qualitatively - prescriptively. The research results show that a notary's obligations include verifying the identity and authority of the parties, reading the deed before the parties and witnesses, including the date/number and signature in accordance with official procedures, and maintaining independence. Violation of these obligations can result in formal and/or material defects in the deed. As a legal consequence, the deed can lose its authentic evidentiary force and only have value as a private deed, and can even be declared null and void, or become the basis for civil, administrative, ethical, and criminal liability as long as the elements are met. The research recommends strengthening procedural compliance, implementing the principle of prudence, and enhancing the effectiveness of oversight mechanisms for notaries.
References
Arif Dikdik, 2006. "The Urgency of Protecting Crime Victims." Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Utama
Aditama, Reflika. Indonesian Notary Law. Jakarta Bina Aksara. pp. 64-71. Jakarta 2013
Ateng Syafrudin, Towards the Implementation of Clean and Responsible State Government, Jurnal Pro Justisia Edition IV, 2000, p. 14
Ahmad Rifai, 2010, Legal Discovery by Judges in the Perspective of Progressive Law, First Edition, Sinar Grafika, Malang
Habib Adjie, 2007, Indonesian Notary Law (Thematic Interpretation of Law Number 30 of 2004 concerning the Position of Notary), PT. Refika Aditama, Surabaya
Hendy Sarmyendra, et.al, The Strength of the Use of Blank Land Deeds by Notaries/Officials Making Land Deeds in the Transfer of Land Rights in Malinau Regency, North Kalimantan, Jurnal Beraja Niti, 3 (4) 2014
I Made Pasek Diantha, 2015, Normative Legal Research Methodology (In Justification of Legal Theory), 1st Edition, Prenada Media Group, Denpasar
Iwan Budisantoso, 2011, accessed from m.kompasiana.com/2608/tanggung-jawab-professinotaris-dalam-menlaksanakan-dan-menegakkan-hukum-di-indonesia
Ira Koesoemawati and Yunirman Rijan, Notary, 1st edition, (Jakarta: Raih Asa Sukses, 2009 Indonesia, Law on the Position of Notary, Law No. 30 of 2004, LN No. 117 of 2004, TLN No. 4432
Indonesian Notaries Association. Notary Code of Ethics, (Bandung: January 27, 2005).
Laurensius Arliman S, 2015, Notaries and Law Enforcement by Judges, Jogjakarta: Deepublish,
Central Board of the Indonesian Notaries Association, The Identity of Indonesian Notaries: Past, Present and Future, 1st ed., (Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka, 2008),
Philipus M. Hadjon et al., Introduction to Indonesian Administrative Law, Gadja Madah University Press, Yogyakarta, 2005
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Muhammad Fadly Sembiring

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.









