Enhancing the Mathematical Creative Thinking Skills of Students at SD Bethany Medan through Outdoor Mathematics Learning Assisted by MathCityMap

Imelda Nababan; Novi Tari Simbolon; Agnes Fransisca Sagala

doi:10.61730/dqd1mb95

Authors

Imelda Nababan Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar, Universitas Quality Berastagi
Novi Tari Simbolon Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar, Universitas Quality Berastagi
Agnes Fransisca Sagala Nanyang Zhi Hui School

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61730/dqd1mb95

Keywords:

Outdoor Mathematics Learning, MathCityMap, Mathematical Creative Thinking, Mathematical Trail, Elementary School

Abstract

Mathematical creative thinking is an essential competence that needs to be developed from elementary school because students are expected to generate ideas, use various strategies, and develop innovative solutions to mathematical problems. However, mathematics learning is still frequently conducted through routine classroom activities that provide limited opportunities for students to explore mathematical concepts in real contexts. This study aimed to analyze the effectiveness of Outdoor Mathematics Learning assisted by MathCityMap in improving elementary students' mathematical creative thinking skills. The study employed a quantitative approach using a quasi-experimental method with a Nonequivalent Control Group Design. The participants consisted of 45 fifth-grade students at SD Bethany Medan, comprising 25 students in the experimental group and 20 students in the control group. Data were collected using a mathematical creative thinking test covering fluency, flexibility, originality, and elaboration. The data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, prerequisite tests, independent sample t-test, and N-Gain analysis. The results showed that the experimental group obtained a higher posttest mean score of 84.73 than the control group, which obtained 72.15. The independent sample t-test resulted in Sig. (2-tailed) = 0.000 < 0.05, indicating a significant difference between the two groups. The N-Gain analysis also showed that the experimental group achieved a high category, while the control group achieved a moderate category. These findings indicated that Outdoor Mathematics Learning assisted by MathCityMap was effective in improving students' mathematical creative thinking skills by integrating real-world contexts, mathematical exploration, collaboration, and digital technology.

References

Arsyad, A. (2019). Media pembelajaran. Rajawali Pers.

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Drijvers, P. (2019). Embodied instrumentation: Combining different views on using digital technology in mathematics education. Digital Experiences in Mathematics Education, 5, 138–148.

Freudenthal, H. (1991). Revisiting mathematics education: China lectures. Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Gravemeijer, K. (1994). Developing realistic mathematics education. Freudenthal Institute.

Guilford, J. P. (1967). The nature of human intelligence. McGraw-Hill.

Hake, R. R. (1998). Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. American Journal of Physics, 66(1), 64–74.

Hannula, M. S. (2019). Young learners’ mathematics-related affect and achievement. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 50(2), 1–14.

Hohenwarter, M., & Jones, K. (2007). Ways of linking geometry and algebra: The case of GeoGebra. Proceedings of the British Society for Research into Learning Mathematics, 27(3), 126–131.

Kaufman, J. C., & Sternberg, R. J. (Editors). (2019). The Cambridge handbook of creativity (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.

Kemp, T., & Vrana, R. (2020). Digital technologies and mathematics learning in authentic contexts. Education and Information Technologies, 25, 1–18.

Kilpatrick, J., Swafford, J., & Findell, B. (Editors). (2001). Adding it up: Helping children learn mathematics. National Academy Press.

Kozlovsky, A. (2020). Mathematical trails as an opportunity for contextual mathematics learning. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 32, 1–15.

Leikin, R. (2019). Openness and creativity: New perspectives in mathematics education. ZDM Mathematics Education, 51, 1–12.

Polya, G. (2004). How to solve it: A new aspect of mathematical method. Princeton University Press.

Schoenfeld, A. H. (2016). Learning to think mathematically: Problem solving, metacognition, and sense-making in mathematics. Journal of Education, 196(2), 1–38.

Silver, E. A. (1997). Fostering creativity through instruction rich in mathematical problem solving and problem posing. ZDM Mathematics Education, 29, 75–80.

Stacey, K. (2018). What is mathematical thinking and why is it important? Mathematics Education Research Journal, 30, 1–10.

Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1999). The concept of creativity: Prospects and paradigms. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 3–15). Cambridge University Press.

Suhaedi, D. (2020). Pembelajaran matematika realistik dalam meningkatkan kemampuan berpikir matematis siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 14(1), 1–10.

Usdiyana, D., Purniati, T., Yulianti, K., & Harningsih, E. (2020). Model pembelajaran matematika realistik untuk meningkatkan kemampuan matematis siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 14(2), 1–12.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.

Widodo, S. A., & Wahyudin. (2018). Selection of learning media mathematics for junior school students. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 17(1), 154–160.